State alimony comparison
Recommended workflow
Start with the legal differences below, run one shared estimate scenario, then open each state guide for the detailed framework courts may apply.
Use this side-by-side data view as a starting point, then review the linked state law guides and calculators for deeper planning context.
| Factor | Idaho | New York |
|---|---|---|
| Support term | spousal maintenance | maintenance |
| Formula profile | need-based | statutory |
| Property system | community | equitable |
| Legal framework | Temporary support may be awarded while the divorce case is pending to address immediate financial needs. Final maintenance is governed by Idaho Code § 32-705 and requires threshold eligibility findings before the court evaluates amount and duration. | Temporary maintenance during divorce proceedings is calculated using statutory formulas established in Domestic Relations Law § 236(B)(5-a). Post-divorce maintenance is governed by § 236(B)(6), where courts apply statutory formulas, duration advisory ranges, and deviation factors before entering a final award. |
| Statute citation | Idaho Code § 32-705; Idaho Code § 32-706 | New York Domestic Relations Law § 236(B)(5-a) (temporary maintenance) and § 236(B)(6) (post-divorce maintenance) |
Best for
Relocation planning, negotiation prep, and state-by-state estimate checks.
Use with
Idaho and New York calculators for same-fact estimates.
Remember
Support outcomes still depend on judge discretion, facts, and local procedure.
Same-facts estimate
Use the same income and marriage facts to see how the planning estimate changes between Idaho and New York. This is educational, not a court prediction.
Conservative educational estimate based on statutory eligibility, reasonable need, ability to pay, income disparity, marriage length, financial resources, employability, education or training needs, health, and Idaho statutory factors; no mandatory statewide formula applies.
$1,333/mo
Planning range: $866-$1,800/mo
Duration: Medium to long marriage
Idaho relies heavily on court discretion or limited eligibility rules, so this estimate should be treated as a broad planning range.
Guideline maintenance estimate using New York's higher formula: 30% of payer income minus 20% of recipient income, capped so the recipient does not receive more than 40% of combined income after maintenance. If the maintenance payer is also the noncustodial parent paying child support, New York uses a lower formula: 20% of payer income minus 25% of recipient income.
$2,000/mo
Planning range: $1,600-$2,400/mo
Duration: About 3 years
Idaho: Conservative educational estimate based on statutory eligibility, reasonable need, ability to pay, income disparity, marriage length, financial resources, employability, education or training needs, health, and Idaho statutory factors; no mandatory statewide formula applies. New York: New York uses statutory guideline formulas for temporary and post-divorce maintenance on the payor's income up to the statutory income cap. The formulas are presumptive guideline calculations, but courts may adjust or deviate if the guideline amount is unjust or inappropriate after considering statutory factors. Maintenance above the income cap is discretionary.
Idaho: Idaho has no fixed statutory duration formula. Maintenance may be temporary while the divorce is pending, fixed-term or rehabilitative after divorce, or longer-term in uncommon cases where the recipient cannot become self-supporting because of age, disability, health, or similar circumstances. Duration depends on need, ability to pay, training or education timeline, marriage length, health, and the court's equitable judgment. New York: New York uses a nonmandatory advisory duration schedule for post-divorce maintenance. For marriages up to and including 15 years, guideline duration is generally 15% to 30% of the marriage length. For marriages over 15 years and up to 20 years, guideline duration is generally 30% to 40% of the marriage length. For marriages over 20 years, guideline duration is generally 35% to 50% of the marriage length. Temporary maintenance lasts only while the divorce case is pending.
Idaho: Idaho maintenance may be modified when the governing order and law permit review after changed circumstances. Courts evaluate changes in need, income, employability, health, or ability to pay. New York: Maintenance orders may be modified when statutory standards for modification are satisfied, including qualifying changes in circumstances. Separation agreements and judgments may contain additional provisions affecting modification rights.
Idaho uses the term maintenance and allows support only after threshold findings that the spouse seeking maintenance lacks sufficient property for reasonable needs and cannot support themselves through employment. Courts do not use a mandatory statewide formula. Once eligibility is established, Idaho courts set amount and duration based on what is just after considering statutory factors.
Eligibility: A spouse may qualify only if they lack sufficient property to provide for reasonable needs and are unable to support themselves through employment. Courts then consider financial resources, training needs, marriage length, age, health, earning ability, and the paying spouse's ability to meet personal needs while paying support. Income disparity alone does not establish entitlement.
New York uses the term maintenance for spousal support and employs statutory formulas that provide presumptive maintenance amounts in many cases. Courts begin with the statutory calculation but may deviate when the formula would be unjust or inappropriate after considering statutory factors. Maintenance awards are intended to address economic disparities created by the marriage and divorce.
Eligibility: A spouse may qualify for maintenance when there is a demonstrated economic disparity and the statutory analysis supports an award. Courts review the parties' incomes, property distribution, future earning potential, and financial circumstances. Qualification does not require fault and is evaluated under the statutory framework.
Alimony rules vary by state. Comparing two states helps readers understand differences in formulas, duration ranges, eligibility rules, modification standards, and judicial discretion before deeper research.
No. SettleCompass comparison pages are educational planning resources only and do not replace advice from a licensed family law attorney.
Yes. State formulas, income caps, duration rules, statutory factors, and judge discretion can produce different outcomes from the same basic facts.
Use state-specific calculator pages to model the same income and marriage-length assumptions across both states.
